Research Project:
Evaluation of Different Methods to Calculate Heavy-Truck VMT
Principal Investigator | External Project Contact | Project Objective | Project Abstract | Task Descriptions, Milestones, and Dates | Student Involvement | Relationship to Other Projects | Technology Transfer Activities | Potential Benefits of the Project | Budget | TRB Keywords
Final Report
- PDF version 821k
- HTML version 300k
Tech Transfer Summary
http://www.ctre.iastate.edu/pubs/t2summaries/heavy_truck_vmt.pdf 561k
Principal Investigator
Shauna Hallmark
Iowa State University
(515) 294-5249
shallmar@iastate.edu
External Project Contact
Dave Plazak
Iowa State University
(515) 296-0814
dplazak@iastate.edu
Project Objective
To evaluate whether current sampling techniques are statistically representative of roadway attributes, and to develop a methodology for transportation-related agencies to share intersection-related asset data.
Project Abstract
Reliable estimates of heavy-truck volumes are important in a number of transportation applications. Estimates of truck volumes are necessary for pavement design and pavement management. Truck volumes are important in traffic safety. The number of trucks on the road also influences roadway capacity and traffic operations. Additionally, heavy vehicles pollute at higher rates than passenger vehicles. Consequently, reliable estimates of heavy-truck vehicle miles traveled (VMT) are important in creating accurate inventories of on-road emissions.
This research evaluated three different methods to calculate heavy-truck annual average daily traffic (AADT) which can subsequently be used to estimate vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Traffic data from continuous count stations provided by the Iowa DOT were used to estimate AADT for two different truck groups (single-unit and multi-unit) using the three methods. The first method developed monthly and daily expansion factors for each truck group. The second and third methods created general expansion factors for all vehicles.
Accuracy of the three methods was compared using n-fold cross-validation. In n-fold cross-validation, data are split into n partitions, and data from the nth partition are used to validate the remaining data. A comparison of the accuracy of the three methods was made using the estimates of prediction error obtained from cross-validation. The prediction error was determined by averaging the squared error between the estimated AADT and the actual AADT.
Overall, the prediction error was the lowest for the method that developed
expansion factors separately for the different truck groups for both single-
and multi-unit trucks. This indicates that use of expansion factors specific
to heavy trucks results in better estimates of AADT, and, subsequently, VMT,
than using aggregate expansion factors and applying a percentage of trucks.
Monthly, daily, and weekly traffic patterns were also evaluated. Significant
variation exists in the temporal and seasonal patterns of heavy trucks as
compared to passenger vehicles. This suggests that the use of aggregate expansion
factors fails to adequately describe truck travel patterns.
Task Descriptions, Milestone, and Dates
Heavy Truck VMT
- Document Process for VMT and ESAL Estimation, October 2002
- Document Process for Other States, January 2003
- Collect Additional Counts, April 2003
- Develop Statistical Method, April 2003
- Compare Methods and Identify Deficiencies, July 2003
- Develop Improvements, October 2003
- Develop Recommendations, October 2003
Roadway Geometry
- Evaluate Common Methods, October 2002
- Identify Specific Data Uses, October 2002
- Evaluate Sampling Methods, January 2003
- Develop Procedures to Collect Representative Samples, April 2003
- Report Results, July 2003
Data Integration
- Inventory Sources of Data, January 2003
- Develop System Architecture, April 2003
- Create the Data Integration Tool, October 2003
Final Report, January 2004
Student Involvement (e.g., Thesis, Assistantships, Paid Employment)
Graduate Students (30 month equivalent)
Undergraduate Students (100 hours total)
Relationship to Other Projects
A pilot study is being conducted in the city of Des Moines to collect an inventory of roadway features for signalized intersections along arterials in the study area. These data will be available for comparison and analysis purposes.
Technology Transfer Activities
Distribution of the final report will be available online to interested parties. Technical briefs, journal articles, workshop presentations, or other methods will be presented as appropriate. The data integration tool will be made available to interested parties.
Potential Benefits of the Project
The project could potentially offer Improved methods for collecting more accurate heavy truck VMT, predicting pavement performance, and scheduling maintenance and rehabilitation. Another benefit of the project is an assessment of whether current data collection and sampling techniques provide adequate data for various asset management and other applications that use inventoried roadway feature data.
Budget
$119,500 ($80,000/year equivalent)
TRB Keywords
Intersection, inventory, data collection, heavy-truck traffic, asset management, decision support

