Research Project:
Decision-Support System for Management of Slope Construction and Repair Activities: An Asset Management Building Block
Principal Investigator | External Project Contact | Project Objective | Project Abstract | Task Descriptions | Milestones, Dates | Student Involvement | Relationship to Other Projects | Technology Transfer Activities | Potential Benefits of the Project | Budget | TRB Keywords
Final Report and Technology Transfer Summary
- PDF version 329k
- HTML version 220k
- T2 summary, Asset Management Tools for Slope Maintenance and Repair Decisions 232k pdf
Principal Investigator
J. Erik Loehr
University of Missouri - Columbia
(573) 882-6380
eloehr@missouri.edu
External Project Contact
David Plazak
Iowa State University
(515) 296-0814
dplazak@iastate.edu
Project Objective
To develop a strategy and prototype decision support system for managing slope stabilization investments in infrastructure right-of-way assets.
Project Abstract
The objective of this project has been to develop a decision support framework based on asset management principles to facilitate effective decision making for selection of appropriate methods to stabilize failed earth slopes. Project activities included development of a simple asset management framework suitable for managing geotechnical assets, development of several analysis models to evaluate alternative slope maintenance and repair strategies, and evaluation of the potential for use of personal digital assistants (PDAs) for implementing geotechnical asset management systems.
A simple framework for managing geotechnical assets was developed based on
mapping of a generic asset management framework proposed by the Federal Highway
Administration. A number of issues that must be addressed prior to complete
implementation of a geotechnical asset management system was also identified.
The most significant of these issues are lack of established procedures and
techniques for collecting the required data and lack of suitable analysis
tools required to evaluate alternative management scenarios. Because ongoing
efforts to address the required data collection and maintenance are underway,
efforts for this project were focused on development of suitable analysis
techniques. Two basic forms of analysis models were developed, both of which
use decision trees to predict outcomes of alternative stabilization measures.
The first form is referred to as the Instant in Time (IIT) form of model to
reflect the fact that the model considers only a single application of a repair
and, in its current form, does not model the potential costs of alternative
stabilization measures over a consistent life-cycle. The second form of model
is referred to as the Specific Time Horizon (STH) form of model because it
provides capabilities to model the potential need for repeated application
of alternative repair techniques within a specified time period. Several preliminary
tools, referred to as “break-even” diagrams, were developed using
the models to illustrate one potential application of the techniques by field
personnel. Efforts undertaken to implement the developed models using personal
digital assistants (PDAs) were unsuccessful due to current lack of portability
of PC-based tools to PDAs. However, the ability to port the PC-based models
to PDAs is expected to be possible in the near future.
Additional efforts should be initiated to incorporate the data collection
tools and procedures being developed by others with the analysis tools developed
as part of this project. Such efforts should result in a fully functional
prototype geotechnical asset management system. The analysis models developed
as part of this project should be modified as described in this report. Such
modifications are expected to require relatively little effort, but will substantially
improve the capabilities and versatility of the models. Once the analysis
tools are enhanced and incorporated with appropriate data collection tools,
efforts should be undertaken to develop guidance for potential users on selection
of appropriate input parameters. Doing so is expected to require a period
of trial implementation wherein sufficient data can be generated and evaluated
to develop appropriate guidance.
Task Descriptions
- Identify and classify costs and hazards for slope failures.
- Develop a preliminary data requirements model.
- Gather data.
- Evaluate, enhance, and apply a preliminary decision support framework.
- Use decision support framework to develop a prototype system design.
- Document project results and implement technology transfer.
Milestones, Dates
Project Start: July 2000
Task 1: September 2000
Task 2: January 2001
Task 3: June 2001
Task 4: January 2002
Task 5: March 2002
Task 6: June 2002
Project End: June 2002
Student Involvement (e.g., Thesis, Assistantships, Paid Employment)
(2) 25% Graduate Assistants (Masters); 24 months
(2) Undergraduate Assistants; 150 hours/year
Relationship to Other Projects
This project will provide a comprehensive study of asset management systems development relative to a specific niche-application module. This particular application will underscore the relevance of maintenance amortization in asset valuation and facility management.
Technology Transfer Activities
The deliverables of this project will include a report describing the decision making framework and prototype decision support system, presentation of the results at regional and national conferences, submission of articles to scholarly publications, and a prototype computer tool for support and implementation of the decision support system. The report will specifically address how the results of this research can be applied to other similar emerging asset management problems. The PIs will also consider developing a short course to be offered to infrastructure maintenance personnel to facilitate implementation of the decision support system.
Potential Benefits of the Project
The direct benefit of the project will be a study of slope repair and maintenance parameters. Other benefits include lessons relative to managing maintenance expense, and development of a decision framework for asset valuations.
Budget
$140,715
TRB Keywords
Slope, Stabilization, Repair, Asset Management, Maintenance

