|
Levels of Achievement |
||||
|
Criteria |
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Marginal |
Unacceptable |
|
Content |
Even,
balanced information clearly and effectively conveys the author’s
message. The author communicates clearly
their in-depth analysis of the topic.
The reader gains insight. |
Information
provides a clear picture of the author’s message. The author demonstrates a basic
understanding of the topic. The reader
gains some insight. |
Authors
conveys their message at times.
Analysis is basic or general.
Reader gains few insights. |
Authors
do not successfully communicate their message. Analysis is vague or not evident. Reader is confused or may be misinformed. |
|
Organization |
Text
is arranged logically. It flows
smoothly from one idea to the next.
The reader easily follows the text. |
Text
is arranged logically. For the most
part, the reader can follow the text. |
The
text is not arranged logically. Ideas
often do not make sense together.
Reader can figure out what the author meant, but may not be motivated
to do so. |
Text
shows no appearance of logical organization.
The reader cannot follow the text and loses interest. |
|
Grammar,
Spelling, Mechanics (i.e. Punctuation, Italics, Capitalization, etc.) |
The
writing is free or almost free of errors. |
There
are occasional violations in the writing, but they don’t represent a major
distraction or obscure the meaning. |
The
writing has numerous errors, and the reader is distracted by them. |
Errors
are so numerous that they obscure the meaning of the passage. The reader is confused and stops reading. |
|
Visuals
(i.e. graphs, tables, figures, etc.) |
All
visuals are very clear, concise, and help the reader understand the
report. They are properly referenced
in and supported by the text. They are
more effective and/or efficient than placing the same information in words. |
Visuals
are clear and easily understood by the reader. The visuals are referred to in the text. |
Visuals
are somewhat understood. The reader
can most likely figure out what they are seeing. Some may not be properly referred to in the
text. |
Visuals
are vague. The reader is confused as
to what they are seeing. Many visuals
are not needed and are not referenced in the text. |
|
Technical
Analysis |
Calculations
are clear, to the point, and easily followed by the reader. All variables are well defined by the
author. There are no errors in the
formulas or the results. |
Calculations
are easily followed by the reader.
Variables are defined. There
are small errors in the formulas or results. |
Calculations
are somewhat understood by the reader, and contain many excess steps not
needed to follow the process. Variables
are to some extent defined. The
formulas or results contain numerous errors. |
Calculations
are vague and reader cannot follow the steps.
Variables are not defined by the author. There are many errors in the formula or
results. |